My persuasive argument thesis is: The Iran government should cease internet censorship.
1. What do people already know about my topic?
2. What research has already been done about my topic?
http://jmagazine.joins.com/newsweek/view/301300?aid=301300 - limit toward SNS to prevent social communication on purpose.
https://www.efa.org.au/Issues/Censor/cens3.html - Internet Censorship around the world
3. What are the implications of my argument (What if I'm right? What if I'm right and people ignore me?)
the government accepts people's suggestions, changes its attitude more flexible, as it does, people can communicate themselves, even participate in
purpose-based online campaign. Or people can not access SNS, youtube
even just for the educative purpose.
As the Internet develops, people want to access more sites, get more information, and express more thing. Thus for fear that people get second thoughts about their country or policy.. etc, some governments try to prevent accessing intentionally, that is internet censorship.
internet censorship is the control or suppression of what can be accessed, published, or viewed on the Internet. It may be carried out by governments or by private organizations at the behest of government, regulators, or on their own initiative. Individuals and organizations may engage in self-censorship for moral, religious, or business reasons, to conform to societal norms, due to intimidation, or out of fear of legal or other consequences. It is used in various ways by the government. As a example for that, Iran blocked the Twitter by which Iranian express their ideas and even participate in the demonstrations.
Blocking some information or some services online comes to be a cause for protest. Then Why do they protest? Because it prevents any reference, further communication, even isolation
internet censorship is the control or suppression of what can be accessed, published, or viewed on the Internet. It may be carried out by governments or by private organizations at the behest of government, regulators, or on their own initiative. Individuals and organizations may engage in self-censorship for moral, religious, or business reasons, to conform to societal norms, due to intimidation, or out of fear of legal or other consequences. It is used in various ways by the government. As a example for that, Iran blocked the Twitter by which Iranian express their ideas and even participate in the demonstrations.
Blocking some information or some services online comes to be a cause for protest. Then Why do they protest? Because it prevents any reference, further communication, even isolation
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기